POSTED: 10/9/15 4:27 PM

High emotions filled 10-10-10-autonomy expectations. “Freedom at last, delivered from slavery, liberation from colonial oppression.” Political leader Helmin Wiels —as Moses, divinely anointed—” was leading his People to the Promised Land.” Finally after centuries of sufferings, there would be social, racial and economic justice. All secret and open meddling by The Hague in all matters of life would come to an end, once and for all, Jacob Gelt Dekker writes in his column on

Autonomy was not enough for many, and a loud clamoring for independence of a sovereign island people was heard. Political rhetoric called for ethnic cleansing. Bombastic threats over the airwaves announced the return of white Dutchmen in body bags.

Euphoria filled chambers and corridors of government. Five Prime Ministers in five years, all armed with a magic wand, had to materialize utopia out of thin air. Seven Ministers of Education would instantly bestow urgently needed academic sophistication on failing students. A newly created parliament disintegrated after only a short while and regrouped somewhat into non-transparent alliances of tiny factions.

Exuberance and intoxication may have built a wild party but did not produce growth of island economy, security for citizens, or deliverance from a society of deeply ingrained corruption. The parental void left by The Hague’s withdrawal was quickly filled with opportunism and usury by organized crime, which ruthlessly recolonized the island.

The big question remains, where goes Curacao from here? What will the island become in another five years from 10-10-15? If we are to believe the present Prime Minister, Ben Whiteman, the island is preparing for a massive influx of Venezuelans, fleeing from the collapsing Bolivarian revolution. The European refugee crisis is teaching us how difficult it is to manage mass migrations. If the migration materializes, the island may be in for a big surprise.

Political leaders often quoted a doubling of the island population as a means to reach economy-of-scale and thus a more viable and attractive wealth level. But also, a massive influx of Latinos would change the cultural and Afro-Caribbean makeup of the island population dramatically. That would mean de facto a recolonization, this time not by the hated Dutch but by equally hated Hispanics; so much for independence or autonomy.

Did you like this? Share it:
Recolonization by

Comments (1)


  1. John Brown says:

    Monday, October 12th 2015/20:16
    The author of these observations inadvertently exposes the
    essence of being master in one’s own home.
    The shadow of dependency is almost always abuse.
    To struggle for independence as the Dutch themselves did,
    is a very plausible goal and from that position to engage in
    alliances to benefit the economic prosperity of all ( EU) is by all means commendable. However to invest and then assume that one becomes owner and master of the people is an expectation that died long ago and since 1954 legally UN) impossible. Better to celebrate with those who tries and then sometimes fail than to gloat and expose one’s real intention.
    Not all Dutch people I believe are the same.

What do you say? Leave a comment